Here is a scheme on how we can use a magnetic circuit, to make a proximity sensor, like so:

  • We consider to have a ferromagnetic target.
  • is the current flowing here generated by the electric circuit.
  • The core has relative permeability , which is large.
  • : the cross area.
  • We expect that the flux line will develop with this geometry here, so:
    • Half circle:
    • Small gap:
    • Straith line:

The inductance value will be:IMPORTANTE Here are the calculations:
(NOT IMPORTANT)

  • So we have all these surfaces, which have the same magnitude order, but we have these two and , which really are reallyh larger than .
  • so we expect to be the most important, even if , the order of magnitude of and is bigger.

The sensitivity will be:IMPORTANTE Where:

  • : is fixed due to the sensor.
  • and depend on the material, of the target.
    ⇒ So you see that the sensitivity this depends on the target, so ()
    ⇒ So you change the material of the target, you change the sensitivity.
    ⇒ The larger is , the larger is the sensitivity.

You can use the same arrangement to sense a variation of the reluctance due to the gap variation, ==even if the target is not ferromagnetic==, but in that case you will have really small sensitivity.

It’s quite similar to what happens for a capacitive sensor, ==but here I have a dependence on the material type==.

Here’s an example of how we can exite and read the sensor:

  • I have an electrical circuit for exciting (), and another one for sensing, called “sensing coil” ().
  • Using this setup, usually, the frequency needed to have a sufficiently strong signal are much lower than those used for capacitive sensing.
    In capacitive sensing we have said that we use .
    Here, usually since signals are larger, is less than .
  • Here’s a comparison between inductive proximty senors vs. capacitive proximity sensors