Remember:

Saddle-Node Bifurcation:

  • First we have a stable and an unstable steady states, so a saddle
  • Then they both converge to a single point, a node.
  • Finally both steady states disappears.

~Ex.:


  • This graph is NOT the “bifurcation diagram”, we will see it later.
  • The arrows in the diagram represnt the steady states, depending or we may have , (actually coinciding” steady states) or steady states.
  • If we analyze this steady states, like we have seen in the previous lectures, we can see that (looking at the red curve), we have 1 stable ss and 1 unstable ss.

  • So for we have a bifurcation.
  • Also not that for we have a marginal system/we are in a marginal systuation.
    You can imagine the two steady states (for the red curve, that are 1 stable and 1 unstable) uniting giving un a mix between a stable and unstable ss, however this does not mean that it’s a marginal ss, more on that later.

Let’s see how we analyzed the steady states on the red parabola:
If we perform the linearization:

REMEMBER: in a non-linar system you may have no steady state, while in a linear system you have at least 1 ss.

For :
We have no steady states.

For , the approximation is marginally stable:
But the actual steady state is NOT!:

  • If we take an inital condition on the left than we will have a stable system.
    However it we take an inital condition on the right than we will have an unstable system.

  • This is the “bifurcation diagram”.
  • The x-axis represents the values of the parameter .
  • The y-axis represents the values of the steady states.
  • A continuos line represents a stable ss.
  • A dotted line represents an unstable ss.
  • For we have a bifurcation, and specifically this is a “saddle-node bifurcation”, since we have 1 stable and 1 unstable steady states that collpase.