• We are not interested/we don’t care about solving for analytically, we will not find the formula, at most we will solve it numerically, that means, solving using numerical data, giving and actual values.

  • Consider the flow as an “image” of the function for some and initial state , where: .

  • In first picture we use a single initial condition, in the second we use many initial conditions, to see how the system evolves.

  • , so as well, are vectors, while the time is a scalar, so .

  • Here’s the example in which
  • In the first graph we represent and
    • is called
    • is called
  • In the second graph we represnt the flow, however it misses the arrows that indicate the flowing of time.
  • If we were to take we would need a 3D graph to represent flow.
  • The first graph is called dyncamics graph, the second phase space.

  • If we take many different initial conditions

  • So when desining the geometry of the phase space, then we will have that a solution in the phase space CANNOT intersect itself, still under the hypotesis that is a differentiable function.

  • eigenvectors ??? and eigenvalues ???TODO

  • This is an example of how we can study the geometry of the steady state.
  • The black point is a STABLE steady state, also called “attractor”.
  • The white point is a UNSTABLE steady state*.
  • The arrows define how ???TODO the system evolves / the initial condition evolves
  • can also be seen as representig the velocity, as you can see the velocity decreases as you approach the stady state.

  • IMPORTANT
  • In case of linear system we need the nullclines, and eigenvectors, to define the phase space.


  • This is a special linear system, depends only on and depends only on .

  • General case.

If we solve analytically we find:We can define:And we can find:However remeber, that we will not find analytic solutions.

We can represent the graph :

  • is a steady state.

Let’s represent the flow:
On the right of the ss (steady state) the derivitave over time () is positive.
While on the left , so:

  • As we can see is a stable steady state.

Now we can study , notice that can assume different values, mainly we will focus on and for . For , basically the graph is the same as before (for ):

Let’s combine this two solutions, and let’s draw the nullclines, so let’s find for and , so:For this case preatty simple, let’s draw the nullclines:

Now we can represent the flow:

  • For we have that the flow will be parallel to the axis.
  • For (the ss) we have that the flow will be parallel to the axis.

If we represent the “motion of a family of particles” (the flow ):

  • This form is becasue , so the velocity along is higher than the velocity along .
  • The velocities we said can be seen as and .

If we take :

Special case for :

  • In all of these cases the node is called “node”.
  • In this particular case, it is called a “node star

Let’s see what happens for :

  • This is an unstable steady state, since:

The nullclines changes:

If we represent :

  • All initial condition will diverge, except and initial condition such that it lies along the axis, so for .
    • For the system will converge to .
    • For the system will diverge.
  • So one component converges and another diverges, for this reason this graph is called a “saddle”, sincenot-sure-about-this

For :

  • We cannot represent any arrow, and it said to be marginally stable.

And the flow for :

  • Called “line of steady states”.

As a sneak-peak for the future, in this system we can define the eigenvalues as: and , the sign of the eigenvalues is strictly correleted to the stability of the steady states.

  • This function is periodic over , however monodimensional system cannot present periodicity over , nor oscillations.
  • As a sneak-peak: we’ll need imaginary eigenvalues in a multidimensional system to have oscillations.

  • mass-spring system (no damper).
  • Since (or because ) we can call this system “coupled”.