So we can say that:

NOTE: The condition can be relaxed and just technical, it grantees that there is a unique solution to the ARE (Algebraic Riccati Equation), you want to avoid non-reachable eigenvalues values on the unit circumference. While the condition is unavoidable, and it says that the non-observable eigenvalues have to be stable , if you cannot measure something it has to go to zero.

  1. of the error : Both limits go to , no matter the initial value :

Solution of the ARE (Algebraic Riccati Equation), in a specific linear case:

Why this is true, will be shown later.

  1. Where, was defined in the “KF as a dynamic system”: Taking the results from the previous point (2.) of

  2. Let’s take a simple version of the DRE (Discrete Riccati Equation): We study the curve: So we obtain something like this: Let’s take a random : To compute we simply do: So we take project on the axis, using the line and calculate : As we iterate, as we can see we will have that So we have shown graphically that that is true

Let’s see what happens for , the starting graph looks something like: The point where the two curves intersect is: So now doing like we did before we will obtain the limit: This is how we can find the two different solution of the DRE for and .

NOTE: is the only exception, for , and not

Let’s now see the case with the disturbance processes and : The theorem holds, so the ARE has an unique solution, as we can see solving the equation: Where:

  • The positive solution will be our man,
  • The negative solution, I don’t care, the variance is always positive. Even if the solution will always be .